Fred. Olsen Ocean AS and Shoreline AS simulate best O&M solution for bigger offshore wind farms
An operations and maintenance (O&M) logistics study by Norwegian software simulation experts Shoreline, for Fred. Olsen Ocean, has found the use of an offshore accommodation platform combined with fast in-field vessels will be key to maximising efficiencies for large, far-from-shore wind farms.
The O&M simulation was performed in collaboration with a major developer and based on the indicative layout of a 100, 200 and 300 turbine offshore wind project in the UK. Three scenarios with different marine logistics combinations were modelled.
The three base scenarios were:
- A single service operation vessel (SOV) with on-board accommodation and access to a helipad
- Two walk-to work-vessels (converted platform supply vessels) working alongside an offshore accommodation platform such as Fred. Olsen Windbase
- Three large 30m crew transfer vessels (CTVs) working alongside an offshore accommodation platform such as Fred. Olsen Windbase
All three scenarios included the use of a helicopter for troubleshooting and additional CTVs over the summer period for scheduled maintenance.
The met ocean data was taken from weather observations over 18 years – between February 1994 and January 2012 – so factored in seasonal changes, and included significant wave height and mean wind speed.
Shoreline employed its MAINTSYS software tool, developed in 2012 as part of a PhD project at University of Stavanger and the Norwegian Centre of Offshore Wind Energy (NORCOWE) and already adopted by several offshore wind farm developers for marine logistics modelling.
The key finding of the simulation, which used a maintenance strategy with specific work order priorities, emergency response time limits and two types of technicians, was that time availability was highest in the third scenario – that of a fixed offshore accommodation platform being used in partnership with larger CTVs.
Fred. Olsen Windbase Project Director David Matthews said that the initial input data for each of the specified base cases was realistic but optimistic, however sensitivity analysis was also included in the report, to consider worst case scenarios as well.
“All three scenarios performed with relatively high time based results, but the best availability – nearly 98% – was with the scenario employing three CTVs combined with an offshore accommodation platform,” he said.
“The main difference was that the scenarios relying on the vessels equipped with walk-to-work access system had less availability when the overall workload was increased because of their low in-park speed in dynamic positioning mode and the limited number of access systems deployed.”
“On larger projects the robustness of the solution chosen is tested as the failures rise. We quickly saw which solution started to fail first and quickest. In short the distances between failures on any given day showed that multiple low cost access vessels performed best.”
“The modelling coupled with a site specific day rate and scope, allows developers to model a fixed offshore facility against other solutions in offshore wind.”